Current:Home > MyJudge dismisses lawsuit by Musk’s X against nonprofit researchers tracking hate speech on platform -Momentum Wealth Path
Judge dismisses lawsuit by Musk’s X against nonprofit researchers tracking hate speech on platform
View
Date:2025-04-23 09:51:56
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X Corp. against the non-profit Center for Countering Digital Hate, which has documented the increase in hate speech on the site since it was acquired by the Tesla owner.
X, formerly known as Twitter, had argued the center’s researchers violated the site’s terms of service by improperly compiling public tweets, and that its subsequent reports on the rise of hate speech cost X millions of dollars when advertisers fled.
On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer dismissed the suit, writing in his order that it was “unabashedly and vociferously about one thing” — punishing the nonprofit for its speech.
X had alleged that the nonprofit “scraped” its site for data, which is against its terms of service. But the judge found that X failed to “allege losses based on technological harms” — that is, the company didn’t show how the scraping led to financial losses for X.
X had sought millions of dollars in damages, arguing that the nonprofit’s reports led to the exodus of advertisers and the loss of ad revenue.
But the judge agreed with CCDH’s argument saying X cannot seek damages for the independent acts of third parties based on CCDH’s reports, or its “speech.”
The center is a nonprofit with offices in the U.S. and United Kingdom. It regularly publishes reports on hate speech, extremism or harmful behavior on social media platforms like X, TikTok or Facebook. The organization has published several reports critical of Musk’s leadership, detailing a rise in anti-LGBTQ hate speech as well as climate misinformation since his purchase.
In a statement posted to X, the social media platform said it “disagrees with the court’s decision and plans to appeal.”
Imran Ahmed, the center’s founder and CEO, said the lawsuit amounted to a “hypocritical campaign of harassment” by a billionaire who talks about protecting free speech but who then uses his wealth to try to silence his critics. He said the lawsuit shows the need for a federal law requiring tech companies to release more information about their operations, so that the public can understand how these powerful platforms are shaping society.
“We hope this landmark ruling will embolden public-interest researchers everywhere to continue, and even intensify, their vital work of holding social media companies accountable for the hate and disinformation they host and the harm they cause,” said Ahmed.
Roberta Kaplan, the center’s attorney, said the dismissal of X’s suit shows “even the wealthiest man cannot bend the rule of law to his will.”
“We are living in an age of bullies, and it’s social media that gives them the power that they have today,” Kaplan said in an email to reporters. “It takes great courage to stand up to these bullies; it takes an organization like the Center for Countering Digital Hate. We are proud and honored to represent CCDH.”
The center is not the only group that has pointed to the rise of hateful material on X since Musk’s purchase in October 2022. Last November, several big advertisers including IBM, NBCUniversal and its parent company Comcast, said that they stopped advertising on X after a report from the liberal advocacy group Media Matters said their ads were appearing alongside material praising Nazis. It was yet another setback as X tries to win back big brands and their ad dollars, X’s main source of revenue. X has also sued Media Matters.
Later that month, Musk went on an expletive-ridden rant in response to advertisers that halted spending on X in response to antisemitic and other hateful material, saying they are are engaging in “blackmail” and, using a profanity, essentially told them to go away.
veryGood! (92)
Related
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Pregnant Stassi Schroeder Wants to Try Ozempic After Giving Birth
- Detlev Helmig Was Frugal With Tax Dollars. Then CU Fired Him for Misusing Funds.
- Following Berkeley’s Natural Gas Ban, More California Cities Look to All-Electric Future
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Fox News' Sean Hannity says he knew all along Trump lost the election
- A Chick-fil-A location is fined for giving workers meals instead of money
- Warmer Temperatures May Offer California Farmers a Rare Silver Lining: Fewer Frosts
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Newark ship fire which claimed lives of 2 firefighters expected to burn for several more days
Ranking
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Why Kim Kardashian Is Feuding With Diva of All Divas Kourtney Kardashian
- Jennifer Lopez Sizzles in Plunging Wetsuit-Inspired Gown at The Flash Premiere
- Middle America’s Low-Hanging Carbon: The Search for Greenhouse Gas Cuts from the Grid, Agriculture and Transportation
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Soccer legend Megan Rapinoe announces she will retire after 2023 season
- Why the proposed TikTok ban is more about politics than privacy, according to experts
- Russia's economy is still working but sanctions are starting to have an effect
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Biden cracking down on junk health insurance plans
Should Solar Geoengineering Be a Tool to Slow Global Warming, or is Manipulating the Atmosphere Too Dangerous?
A $1.6 billion lawsuit alleges Facebook's inaction fueled violence in Ethiopia
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
On Florida's Gulf Coast, developers eye properties ravaged by Hurricane Ian
Fox News' Sean Hannity says he knew all along Trump lost the election
Government Delays First Big U.S. Offshore Wind Farm. Is a Double Standard at Play?